Strategy ID# 16517
Moderator: Aitrus
Strategy ID# 16517
Been here since Sept 2017 and loving this site! Can anyone find a better strategy ID# with the best mean/std deviation ratio?
Currently, strategy #16517 has a 30.99% mean and a low std deviation of 4.03...can anyone find a better one than this?
Currently, strategy #16517 has a 30.99% mean and a low std deviation of 4.03...can anyone find a better one than this?
Currently Following Strategy #57171: http://tspcalc.com/seasonal.php?ID=57171
Re: Strategy ID# 16517
A quick search revealed #19269 being the best as far as a ratio between Mean return to STD is concerned after using a 5% max parameter in the STD field.
Re: Strategy ID# 16517
I just got started myself and had been following 16517. I am switching to 19268, due to the lower exposure to F fund. It is the essentially the same as 19269, with a couple of Gs instead of Fs. Basically the same Mean and STD.jonasm92 wrote:A quick search revealed #19269 being the best as far as a ratio between Mean return to STD is concerned after using a 5% max parameter in the STD field.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2015 1:24 pm
Re: Strategy ID# 16517
Check 18390
Currently Following Strategy #57171: http://tspcalc.com/seasonal.php?ID=57171
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 10:54 am
Re: Strategy ID# 16517
I keep seeing this strategy 16517. Where can I find information on WHAT that even is? Or 18390? How do I find that?
Re: Strategy ID# 16517
I'm also watching 18368 and 17866 for switching to in CY18
Re: Strategy ID# 16517
I searched all complete years (2017 is incomplete so it is excluded).
StdDev no greater than 3% = 17619
Mean: 30.34
StdDev: 2.98
Best Year 2010: 34.96
Worst Year 2007: 25.58
StdDev no greater than 4% = 19269
Mean: 31.50
StdDev: 3.89
Best Year 2009: 38.46
Worst Year 2007: 24.61
StdDev no greater than 5% = 17835
Mean: 32.23
StdDev: 4.82
Best Year 2009: 38.86
Worst Year 2015: 23.41
StdDev no greater than 3% = 17619
Mean: 30.34
StdDev: 2.98
Best Year 2010: 34.96
Worst Year 2007: 25.58
StdDev no greater than 4% = 19269
Mean: 31.50
StdDev: 3.89
Best Year 2009: 38.46
Worst Year 2007: 24.61
StdDev no greater than 5% = 17835
Mean: 32.23
StdDev: 4.82
Best Year 2009: 38.86
Worst Year 2015: 23.41
Re: Strategy ID# 16517
So many flavors....Decisions, Decisions, Decisions. They all look pretty good. Thanks for your efforts.Rothwell wrote:I searched all complete years (2017 is incomplete so it is excluded).
StdDev no greater than 3% = 17619
Mean: 30.34
StdDev: 2.98
Best Year 2010: 34.96
Worst Year 2007: 25.58
StdDev no greater than 4% = 19269
Mean: 31.50
StdDev: 3.89
Best Year 2009: 38.46
Worst Year 2007: 24.61
StdDev no greater than 5% = 17835
Mean: 32.23
StdDev: 4.82
Best Year 2009: 38.86
Worst Year 2015: 23.41
Re: Strategy ID# 16517
Currently stuck between #19046 and #15533 for '18.
Both are great, and I have a lot of years left so I can tolerate a slightly higher Std Dev if it means a higher mean and total compound return.
Both are great, and I have a lot of years left so I can tolerate a slightly higher Std Dev if it means a higher mean and total compound return.
Your Free Financial Advisor. Zero trading costs
https://www.wisebanyan.com/referral/92F0PFFWI
https://www.wisebanyan.com/referral/92F0PFFWI
Fund Prices2024-03-28
Fund | Price | Day | YTD |
G | $18.15 | 0.05% | 1.05% |
F | $19.08 | -0.06% | -0.74% |
C | $82.21 | 0.11% | 10.55% |
S | $82.43 | 0.30% | 6.92% |
I | $42.57 | -0.24% | 5.95% |
L2065 | $16.38 | 0.02% | 8.37% |
L2060 | $16.39 | 0.02% | 8.38% |
L2055 | $16.39 | 0.02% | 8.38% |
L2050 | $32.73 | 0.01% | 6.95% |
L2045 | $14.91 | 0.02% | 6.58% |
L2040 | $54.38 | 0.02% | 6.22% |
L2035 | $14.34 | 0.02% | 5.79% |
L2030 | $47.67 | 0.02% | 5.38% |
L2025 | $13.15 | 0.03% | 3.43% |
Linc | $25.61 | 0.03% | 2.82% |