Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
Moderator: Aitrus
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
Just had a realization. 45 associates with Alex Jones who believes there are lizard people. Maybe there is a literal belief in swamp people in the government?
I'll be the first to say "sssssssssssssss."
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
i work for the Government. Alex Jones is right. i think my boss might be one.cswift01 wrote:Just had a realization. 45 associates with Alex Jones who believes there are lizard people. Maybe there is a literal belief in swamp people in the government?
I'll be the first to say "sssssssssssssss."
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
More like an attack on federal employees and what remains of the middle class.
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
Sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one finding it odd that there is personal wealth being built at the expense of taxpayers. While I know it's always happened behind closed doors, when it's "in your face" and no one responds...well, to say the least I'm not shocked by what's going on...JDD4J4J wrote:More like an attack on federal employees and what remains of the middle class.
- jlozano042
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 12:37 pm
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
The best part, as is always with most articles, are the comments.
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
What's the middle class?
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
Haha, I love when they start with good natured comments. Then, by the 3rd poster all hell breaks lose.jlozano042 wrote:The best part, as is always with most articles, are the comments.
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
Will you clarify this? Not sure who you are implying is building this wealth.cswift01 wrote:Sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one finding it odd that there is personal wealth being built at the expense of taxpayers. While I know it's always happened behind closed doors, when it's "in your face" and no one responds...well, to say the least I'm not shocked by what's going on...JDD4J4J wrote:More like an attack on federal employees and what remains of the middle class.
OCTOBER: This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in stocks in. The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June, December, August, and February. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/29/ivanka- ... tions.htmlArrieS wrote:Will you clarify this? Not sure who you are implying is building this wealth.cswift01 wrote:Sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one finding it odd that there is personal wealth being built at the expense of taxpayers. While I know it's always happened behind closed doors, when it's "in your face" and no one responds...well, to say the least I'm not shocked by what's going on...JDD4J4J wrote:More like an attack on federal employees and what remains of the middle class.
-
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 1:38 pm
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
From the mouth of Office of Personnel Management Director Jeff T. H. Pon:
Pon said. “ I don’t believe that we should look at a federal job for 30 years and then retire and then have, you know, lifetime retirement anymore.”
This is the same guy who thinks a COLA is Locality Pay and that he needs to take away "Locality Pay" from retirees.
I don't know what he means but then I don't think he knows what he means either.
Pon said. “ I don’t believe that we should look at a federal job for 30 years and then retire and then have, you know, lifetime retirement anymore.”
This is the same guy who thinks a COLA is Locality Pay and that he needs to take away "Locality Pay" from retirees.
I don't know what he means but then I don't think he knows what he means either.
- dougellen1
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
I'm a "senior manager" in the gov. It's about time we have the tools to get rid of people who truly deserve to be let go. It's rare, but the bad actors do exist. Why can't people see the reality of this.
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
I believe there is push back against this for a couple of reasons:dougellen1 wrote:I'm a "senior manager" in the gov. It's about time we have the tools to get rid of people who truly deserve to be let go. It's rare, but the bad actors do exist. Why can't people see the reality of this.
1. The tools to remove employees are already there.
2. It should not be easy to remove employees.
Regarding point 1.
There is a belief that the tools to remove employees are already there. And that some managers are not motivated enough (or too lazy) or not competent enough to use them.
So rather than make it easier to remove employees (see point 2), more competent managers should instead be hired/trained. Why not just make it easier?
Regarding point 2.
It should not be easy to convict a US citizen; sentence a citizen to death; or 'sentence' a citizen to the 'economic death penalty:' removal/termination. It should require checks and balances; red tape; and bureaucracy. Why?
Because just as you say "there are bad actors," there are also managers who are bad/incompetent/biased actors.
Now, while you may be a perfect person and manager, a good manager, fully competent in all things related to your job and the jobs of those you manage, and without any biases--great or small--whatsoever: Not all managers fit that bill.
If we could somehow create a verifiably perfect manager (through genetic manipulation?), then these managers should be given carte blanche to fire employees at will--no questions asked.
But, if the removal is improper...they should be able to get their job back if improperly terminated.?
Maybe. The burden usually shifts to a guilty until proven innocent type of thing, whereby the victim may have to prove negatives with little evidence.
There are reasons our society increased the difficulty in proving guilt in criminal cases (beyond reasonable doubt) vs. civil cases (preponderance); one being the ability to return someone to the status quo ante in the event that justice fails.
We can't 'undo' an improper incarceration (or execution--of course). We can't undo the effects on the family members; the missed events (kids graduating, weddings, deaths, vacations, etc.)
The physical and psychological effects of an improper removal on the victim and the family are likely irreversible.
So to guard against this, and managers abusing their authority to end an employee's income stream. It should not be so easy to remove employees.
It's not like no employee has ever been removed before. It just take a competent supervisor/manager, effort, and a deserving employee.
If there is such a large number of bad actors around...maybe we need legislation making it easier to fire all these managers who can't seem to figure out how to remove "bad actors."
Last edited by userque on Wed May 30, 2018 2:59 am, edited 2 times in total.
"In the land of idiots, the moron is King."
-
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:01 pm
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
Userque, totally agree especially with point 2 and the tools are definitely already and have been in place for the managers/supervisors.
Moneys’ Money Making Money (4M)
Re: Trump takes aim at federal bureaucracy with new orders
Honestly, we tell ourselves its easy to fire people in the corporate world, but that's not entirely true. There are tons of labor laws, the fear of being sued and firing costs that are taken into consideration with letting an employee go. Sure, in the at-will states firing happens all the time, but it has its hurdles. Of course, people also sprout out information about things they don't know...
Here's a great paper on comparing growth rates with business friendly environments (https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/~/med ... h-2006.pdf) and firing.
Also an interesting book on remaking the laws:
https://tinyurl.com/ya4a8nft
Here's a great paper on comparing growth rates with business friendly environments (https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/~/med ... h-2006.pdf) and firing.
Also an interesting book on remaking the laws:
https://tinyurl.com/ya4a8nft
Fund Prices2024-04-17
Fund | Price | Day | YTD |
G | $18.19 | 0.01% | 1.25% |
F | $18.68 | 0.50% | -2.85% |
C | $78.62 | -0.58% | 5.72% |
S | $76.27 | -0.89% | -1.07% |
I | $40.66 | -0.17% | 1.19% |
L2065 | $15.60 | -0.47% | 3.17% |
L2060 | $15.60 | -0.47% | 3.18% |
L2055 | $15.60 | -0.47% | 3.18% |
L2050 | $31.39 | -0.35% | 2.57% |
L2045 | $14.34 | -0.33% | 2.47% |
L2040 | $52.43 | -0.31% | 2.41% |
L2035 | $13.87 | -0.28% | 2.31% |
L2030 | $46.25 | -0.25% | 2.24% |
L2025 | $12.93 | -0.12% | 1.78% |
Linc | $25.29 | -0.09% | 1.55% |