Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
Moderator: Aitrus
Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
I closed out the last part of 2017 in #16198, like many others. It was very good to us, and I like the combination of high mean and low std dev. However, the F fund is driving me nuts. It has been a pretty horrible investing experience any time the F fund rolls around in either the daily or seasonal strategies for the last couple of years. I'm not sure I can stomach it much longer. As a result, I'm thinking about switching to #19408. It has a sub-4 std dev and still a mean higher than 30, while limiting the F fund exposure to just 8% vs. 24%.
Other considerations: G fund returns aren't going up, so increased G fund exposure means less return but still no risk of losing money. I would like to see more I fund investment, though strategies with higher I fund tend to have higher std dev. Go figure!
Any thoughts anyone else could share on this? I know a few have been talking about limiting F fund exposure as well.
Other considerations: G fund returns aren't going up, so increased G fund exposure means less return but still no risk of losing money. I would like to see more I fund investment, though strategies with higher I fund tend to have higher std dev. Go figure!
Any thoughts anyone else could share on this? I know a few have been talking about limiting F fund exposure as well.
"Get your money for nothin', and your chicks for free."
Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.
Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.
- jlozano042
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 12:37 pm
Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
Noticed the links in your post were broken, I believe there is an extra (http) in them.
19408
Ooops - never mind, URLs are working now.
19408
Ooops - never mind, URLs are working now.
Last edited by jlozano042 on Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
Yeah I noticed it to. I've edited this post like a dozen times already, lol. The links now include the opposing strategy as a benchmark also.jlozano042 wrote:Noticed the links in your post were broken, I believe there is an extra (http) in them.
19408
"Get your money for nothin', and your chicks for free."
Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.
Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.
Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
Maybe consider strategy 23712? I created it yesterday and plan on using it for 2018. From what I can tell, it's currently one of the best in its class.
Mean: 30.24%
Standard Deviation: 2.78%
Percentage of Year in F Fund: 11%
Mean: 30.24%
Standard Deviation: 2.78%
Percentage of Year in F Fund: 11%
Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
It does look attractive. It spends a little less time in equities alltogether also. Another plus that you probably didn’t plan on is it I’d very IRA friendly. No real problem with trades clearing before the next trade is made. I follow this plan with my Roth IRA too so it’s nice to find plans that allow at least three days in a Fund before trading to the next.Chindsey wrote:Maybe consider strategy 23712? I created it yesterday and plan on using it for 2018. From what I can tell, it's currently one of the best in its class.
"Get your money for nothin', and your chicks for free."
Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.
Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.
-
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 1:38 pm
Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
The tsp.calc site does allow you to create a new strategy with higher I fund exposure.SnareMV17 wrote:I closed out the last part of 2017 in #16198, like many others.
Other considerations: G fund returns aren't going up, so increased G fund exposure means less return but still no risk of losing money. I would like to see more I fund investment, though strategies with higher I fund tend to have higher std dev. Go figure!
Any thoughts anyone else could share on this? I know a few have been talking about limiting F fund exposure as well.
mo meng, mo ching (which loosely means: no money, no life)
Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
If you can't handle small lost on F fund then expect to be more difficult to handle with C, S or I funds. Investment always risk just to see how much can you handle your risk vs reward.SnareMV17 wrote:I closed out the last part of 2017 in #16198, like many others. It was very good to us, and I like the combination of high mean and low std dev. However, the F fund is driving me nuts. It has been a pretty horrible investing experience any time the F fund rolls around in either the daily or seasonal strategies for the last couple of years. I'm not sure I can stomach it much longer. As a result, I'm thinking about switching to #19408. It has a sub-4 std dev and still a mean higher than 30, while limiting the F fund exposure to just 8% vs. 24%.
Other considerations: G fund returns aren't going up, so increased G fund exposure means less return but still no risk of losing money. I would like to see more I fund investment, though strategies with higher I fund tend to have higher std dev. Go figure!
Any thoughts anyone else could share on this? I know a few have been talking about limiting F fund exposure as well.
“A brave man knows the circumstances and consequences of what he may encounter ahead…..but moves forward anyway.”
- bamafamily
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 1:18 pm
Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
I decided to go with a fund with no 'F' for (at the least) the first quarter....I will probably stay in it at least through the first 2 rate hikes.
The main reason I stay in 'G' is not to make money....but not to lose what I have gained in C,S,I.......
The main reason I stay in 'G' is not to make money....but not to lose what I have gained in C,S,I.......
Bama
Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
Was considering these two strategies (gclapper’s M3 Mix And tmj100’s Mix) But after seeing #16198 and # 19408; I may need to reconsider.
Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
I changed from 16198 end of 2017, now following 20835 for 2018 while staying away from F.
Set tspcalc.com for max 1.0 % of time in F fund which returns one day in F fund each year.
2004-20017 mean 29.23; std dev 3.26; Sigma 8.9 Currently in G fund awaiting arrival of 19 Jan to make switch to S.
Good luck to all.
Set tspcalc.com for max 1.0 % of time in F fund which returns one day in F fund each year.
2004-20017 mean 29.23; std dev 3.26; Sigma 8.9 Currently in G fund awaiting arrival of 19 Jan to make switch to S.
Good luck to all.
In investing, what is comfortable is rarely profitable.
-Robert Arnott
-Robert Arnott
Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408
Holy smokes, that #20835 has more red than a lobster! A little shy on I Fund too, huh?
"Get your money for nothin', and your chicks for free."
Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.
Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.
Fund Prices2024-04-18
Fund | Price | Day | YTD |
G | $18.19 | 0.01% | 1.27% |
F | $18.62 | -0.30% | -3.14% |
C | $78.45 | -0.21% | 5.50% |
S | $76.12 | -0.20% | -1.27% |
I | $40.67 | 0.02% | 1.21% |
L2065 | $15.58 | -0.13% | 3.04% |
L2060 | $15.58 | -0.13% | 3.04% |
L2055 | $15.58 | -0.13% | 3.04% |
L2050 | $31.35 | -0.13% | 2.44% |
L2045 | $14.32 | -0.12% | 2.35% |
L2040 | $52.37 | -0.11% | 2.29% |
L2035 | $13.85 | -0.10% | 2.21% |
L2030 | $46.21 | -0.09% | 2.15% |
L2025 | $12.93 | -0.05% | 1.72% |
Linc | $25.28 | -0.04% | 1.51% |