Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

General TSP Discussion.

Moderator: Aitrus

Post Reply
SnareMV17
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:06 am

Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by SnareMV17 »

I closed out the last part of 2017 in #16198, like many others. It was very good to us, and I like the combination of high mean and low std dev. However, the F fund is driving me nuts. It has been a pretty horrible investing experience any time the F fund rolls around in either the daily or seasonal strategies for the last couple of years. I'm not sure I can stomach it much longer. As a result, I'm thinking about switching to #19408. It has a sub-4 std dev and still a mean higher than 30, while limiting the F fund exposure to just 8% vs. 24%.

Other considerations: G fund returns aren't going up, so increased G fund exposure means less return but still no risk of losing money. I would like to see more I fund investment, though strategies with higher I fund tend to have higher std dev. Go figure!

Any thoughts anyone else could share on this? I know a few have been talking about limiting F fund exposure as well.
"Get your money for nothin', and your chicks for free."

Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.

User avatar
jlozano042
Posts: 836
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 12:37 pm

Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by jlozano042 »

Noticed the links in your post were broken, I believe there is an extra (http) in them. :wink:

19408


Ooops - never mind, URLs are working now.
Last edited by jlozano042 on Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

SnareMV17
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:06 am

Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by SnareMV17 »

jlozano042 wrote:Noticed the links in your post were broken, I believe there is an extra (http) in them. :wink:

19408
Yeah I noticed it to. I've edited this post like a dozen times already, lol. The links now include the opposing strategy as a benchmark also.
"Get your money for nothin', and your chicks for free."

Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.

Chindsey
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:52 pm

Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by Chindsey »

Maybe consider strategy 23712? I created it yesterday and plan on using it for 2018. From what I can tell, it's currently one of the best in its class.

Mean: 30.24%
Standard Deviation: 2.78%
Percentage of Year in F Fund: 11%

SnareMV17
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:06 am

Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by SnareMV17 »

Chindsey wrote:Maybe consider strategy 23712? I created it yesterday and plan on using it for 2018. From what I can tell, it's currently one of the best in its class.
It does look attractive. It spends a little less time in equities alltogether also. Another plus that you probably didn’t plan on is it I’d very IRA friendly. No real problem with trades clearing before the next trade is made. I follow this plan with my Roth IRA too so it’s nice to find plans that allow at least three days in a Fund before trading to the next.
"Get your money for nothin', and your chicks for free."

Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.

mindofmush
Posts: 353
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 1:38 pm

Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by mindofmush »

SnareMV17 wrote:I closed out the last part of 2017 in #16198, like many others.

Other considerations: G fund returns aren't going up, so increased G fund exposure means less return but still no risk of losing money. I would like to see more I fund investment, though strategies with higher I fund tend to have higher std dev. Go figure!

Any thoughts anyone else could share on this? I know a few have been talking about limiting F fund exposure as well.
The tsp.calc site does allow you to create a new strategy with higher I fund exposure.
mo meng, mo ching (which loosely means: no money, no life)

User avatar
Winner
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:40 am

Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by Winner »

SnareMV17 wrote:I closed out the last part of 2017 in #16198, like many others. It was very good to us, and I like the combination of high mean and low std dev. However, the F fund is driving me nuts. It has been a pretty horrible investing experience any time the F fund rolls around in either the daily or seasonal strategies for the last couple of years. I'm not sure I can stomach it much longer. As a result, I'm thinking about switching to #19408. It has a sub-4 std dev and still a mean higher than 30, while limiting the F fund exposure to just 8% vs. 24%.

Other considerations: G fund returns aren't going up, so increased G fund exposure means less return but still no risk of losing money. I would like to see more I fund investment, though strategies with higher I fund tend to have higher std dev. Go figure!

Any thoughts anyone else could share on this? I know a few have been talking about limiting F fund exposure as well.
If you can't handle small lost on F fund then expect to be more difficult to handle with C, S or I funds. Investment always risk just to see how much can you handle your risk vs reward.
“A brave man knows the circumstances and consequences of what he may encounter ahead…..but moves forward anyway.”

User avatar
bamafamily
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 1:18 pm

Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by bamafamily »

I decided to go with a fund with no 'F' for (at the least) the first quarter....I will probably stay in it at least through the first 2 rate hikes.
The main reason I stay in 'G' is not to make money....but not to lose what I have gained in C,S,I.......
Bama

Ericdelee
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:09 pm

Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by Ericdelee »

Was considering these two strategies (gclapper’s M3 Mix And tmj100’s Mix) But after seeing #16198 and # 19408; I may need to reconsider.

User avatar
mhende2
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2016 12:32 pm

Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by mhende2 »

I changed from 16198 end of 2017, now following 20835 for 2018 while staying away from F.
Set tspcalc.com for max 1.0 % of time in F fund which returns one day in F fund each year.
2004-20017 mean 29.23; std dev 3.26; Sigma 8.9 Currently in G fund awaiting arrival of 19 Jan to make switch to S.
Good luck to all.
In investing, what is comfortable is rarely profitable.
-Robert Arnott

SnareMV17
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:06 am

Re: Considering Change from #16198 to #19408

Post by SnareMV17 »

Holy smokes, that #20835 has more red than a lobster! A little shy on I Fund too, huh?
"Get your money for nothin', and your chicks for free."

Following TSPCalc strategy #64902.

Post Reply

Fund Prices2024-04-18

FundPriceDayYTD
G $18.19 0.01% 1.27%
F $18.62 -0.30% -3.14%
C $78.45 -0.21% 5.50%
S $76.12 -0.20% -1.27%
I $40.67 0.02% 1.21%
L2065 $15.58 -0.13% 3.04%
L2060 $15.58 -0.13% 3.04%
L2055 $15.58 -0.13% 3.04%
L2050 $31.35 -0.13% 2.44%
L2045 $14.32 -0.12% 2.35%
L2040 $52.37 -0.11% 2.29%
L2035 $13.85 -0.10% 2.21%
L2030 $46.21 -0.09% 2.15%
L2025 $12.93 -0.05% 1.72%
Linc $25.28 -0.04% 1.51%

Live Charts

Pending Allocations

Under development. For now, you may view Pending Allocations by going to "fantasy TSP" and selecting "Leaderboard sort" of "Pending Allocations".