Aitrus wrote:...
userque - While you are free to post what you wish (within reason and according to site rules), but I would suggest more than just posting a video and nothing else. When you post a clipped news story or link to a video without providing your thoughts and commentary on it, readers are only left with an impression without understanding why you are posting. Given your past discussions and thoughts, it's easy to conclude (rightly or wrongly) that you are posting with certain intent or political stance. This invites a response akin to what Billionair is doing - making assumptions about you based solely from what you've posted but without clarifying commentary and in light of your posting history.
Billionair's responded immediately with name calling. That's inappropriate, regardless my position.
If I included the quote, "I AGREE WITH ARTICLE" his response would have been the same as he assumed things outside of the article.
I post articles for information. People are free to read them, and be informed. Or not read them.
If they want to know how I feel, they can ask.
Freedom to speak also includes the freedom to not speak. Sometimes I have more to say. Sometimes I don't.
Right now, we can decide for ourselves whether we want to add our own commentary to news articles we post, financial or otherwise.
If there is now a rule that everyone must now include their personal thoughts when posting news articles, I'll continue to decide for myself whether I want to add my own opinion to news articles that I post.
Then, when he questions you about it, you question him in return insinuating that you have done nothing wrong and challenging him to prove his positions.
No. He called me out of my name, in violation of the rules. You seem to want to gloss over that part.
This seems disingenuous of you - you post something inflammatory
How is posting that China tells Trump don't hide inflammatory?
Anything can unreasonably inflame another. Whether we are inflamed or not, we should still be civil.
without stating your point, then jumping on somebody who questions you based on assumptions. You're not doing yourself any favors by using the presentation method that you've chosen to employ.
Show me where I jumped on someone. It seems
others saw the attack for what it was.
What I'm saying is: it would be helpful if we knew why you were posting what you're posting. This might help avoid misunderstandings or incorrect assumptions. Otherwise, what you're doing can be easily interpreted as "s*!t stirring" or "poking the bear".
I explained above.