Aitrus wrote:...If you disagree and believe that mail-in-balloting is reasonably free of fraud, please provide evidence to show that this is the case, and that current oversight measures (if any) are sufficient to prevent such fraud.
Sorry for your loss Aitrus,
I wanted to respond to the last part of your post right away. I'll eventually get to the rest.
The onus is not on me to prove the ordinary; the status quo; the accepted. That's like me telling you, "If you don't believe that there is life on Mars, provide evidence."
But I
would simply point you to the evidence; the conclusions of the Trump administration. Why would I have to do more than that?
(You used an unclear word. What's '
reasonable?' It's your word/question, you tell me. That's really irrelevant here, I just mentioned it so we can keep it in mind going forward.)
I believe the current evidence. If, like you, I believed outside what we know, then it would be up to
me to provide evidence. You're, in effect, saying,
"Hey userque, I got this conspiracy theory that I believe, prove it wrong if you don't believe it too." Doesn't work that way.
There is no evidence of massive or wide spread fraud. That's the accepted evidence. That's what I believe. Nothing is 100% secure. Banks get robbed, etc.
Sure, anything's possible. Quantum theory tells us that everything is possible; but every possibility comes with a particular likelihood attached.
I believe it is extremely improbable that mail-in voter fraud has been committed sufficient enough to sway the outcome of a Presidential election. That is what Trump's people have also concluded. Are you calling Trump a liar?
However, while researching this topic, I did find that illegal gerrymandering occurred/occurs sufficient enough to affect the outcomes of House elections, benefiting the Republican party.
Now, if you are truly gung-ho on preventing election fraud ... there you go.
I believe we still have some issues you haven't yet addressed, I'll eventually gather them up for you.