Tomany's name shows up bold because back when King still owned the site, Tomany was a dues-paying member, and so his name was highlighted bold to reflect that as a kind of small reward or token of elevated membership on the site. There are a few others scattered around as well, but he's the most active poster.userque wrote: Good luck with that. Tomanyiron also doesn't seem to respond when 'cornered' with facts and evidence; same as others' I've shown that don't seem to respond.
Btw, why does Tomanyiron's name show up in bold type, like MJ's and Aitrus' in the latest posts section?
MJ and I are highlighted bold because we are Admin and Moderator. You may recall that Skiehawk11 is highlighted the same way. It was King's intention to have Admins and Mods quickly and easily identified by members - especially newbies, and this tradition continues under MJ's ownership.
As for members not answering your questions or being "cornered" as you seem to want to call it (I have serious doubts on this obviously subjective point, but won't go into it here), I seem to recall a fair number of my questions / data / facts / points not answered by you. As I recall, the wording was often something along the lines of "Your question has been noted and added to the list of questions I'll consider at a later time" or similar wording (Side note: Exactly why you haven't answered those questions or points I won't speculate on, but at this point I don't care if you do or don't. I made my argumentative points and it was up to you to answer or disprove them or not - and you chose not to.). Then, after such a statement was made, you would often launch into attacks on your opponent's character, utilizing a fair bit of sophistry in an effort to poison the well. Skilled sophistry to be sure, but still sophistry.
But to claim that others aren't answering your questions and to intimate that you've somehow "cornered" them when they don't answer...well, I guess I can only say that there's a lesson about people who live in glass houses and all that.
My conjecture to your quandary is that perhaps others have noticed this trend, and have opted not to engage with you as I have in the past.
Cheers! I'll let you guys get back to discussing George Kirby now...or are you done discussing him and want me to shut down the thread?