bloobs wrote: ↑Tue Oct 05, 2021 8:07 am
Agree on delta's contagiousness. Technically, delta indeed has a higher viral load than previous variants in vaccinated patients. But this also infers that delta's viral load is EVEN higher in unvaccinated patients--so according to this metric, being vaccinated still presents a significant benefit in preventing spread.
The Vietnam study that measured the viral load and did further testing of the viral type for fully vaccinated healthcare workers did not compare vaccinated to unvaccinated so I see no basis for your inference. Vaccinated workers were passing it among each other so I see no benefit to the vaccine preventing the spread when all were vaccinated and they all came down with COVID. It makes one wonder if the vaccines are causing the Delta variant. Short Video censored, removed from YouTube
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Xt1XGwiHBdSo/
bloobs wrote: ↑Tue Oct 05, 2021 8:07 amCorrect, the DoD study shows a drop in vaccine efficacy after 6 months. But I have trouble understanding why you think a vaccine is not effective if it's only highly effective (meaning at >90+%) for 6 months? Also, don't you think that expecting any vaccine (or any medicine for that matter) to be only effective if it
completely prevents breakthrough cases is an unreasonable expectation? Those are high-fallutin' standards there that no human enterprise has and can ever achieve.
Most medicines today only treat the symptoms; Drug companies don't want you cured, it is bad for business. Pro-vaxers always point to the fact that we eradicated childhood diseases like Measles, Mump, Smallpox here in the US. (COVID shots are EUA, new tech, different from typical vaccines). When was the last time we had breakthrough cases for these? There are more injuries and deaths reported for COVID than all other vaccines combined...whether or not there are any breakthrough cases, you really want to take an experimental shot with this record? Perhaps you are suffering from Cognitive Dissonance or rationalization.
bloobs wrote: ↑Tue Oct 05, 2021 8:07 amThis assumption that
reactive care (e.g. better treatment of infected individuals) makes some sense. Alternatively, my assumption is that
preventative care (e.g. 180 million vaccinated US residents) has probably made the biggest difference in reducing severe disease and death rates.
I disagree. Why is it that those countries with the highest vaccination rates have the biggest COVID problem? (see video above) The vaccines do not appear to be effective against the Delta variant (this was also discussed in the FDA Hearing for the Booster, previously posted video, and there were questions as to whether they would be modifying the booster shot.)
If I have less than a 1% chance of dying from COVID with proper early treatment, why do I want to take a vaccine that can severely injure or kill me? 48,000+ Deaths in Medicare patients died within 14 days of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine; 15,000+ Deaths in VAERS and many more serious reactions and disabilities from these experimental vaccines. Social Media is even censoring any mention of deaths related to the vaccines.
bloobs wrote: ↑Tue Oct 05, 2021 8:07 amFurther, remember that vaccination rates among those most likely to succumb to COVID (elderly and immuno-compromised) has achieved herd immunity to those two demographics.
No, immunity wanes the most for those 65+. That is why the FDA review board voted to approve the booster
only for those 65+ and other high risk groups.